Return to main Research page

Contact KarlPurposeColloidal Gold Systems 101Colloidal Gold Systems 102Colloidal Gold Systems 103

Colloidal Gold Systems 104Orme Research 1Orme Research 2Orme Research 3Orme Research 4

Orme Research 5Asymmetrical Plasma ElectrolysisMagnetic Motor ResearchEHD Thruster

The Colloidal Gold Exchange (Independant Results)

CARET - Information on Commercial Applications Research for Extraterrestrial Technology

Breakdown of Caret Information

Breakdown of Caret Information 1

Breakdown of Caret Information 2

Breakdown of Caret Information 3

Caret Breakdown Details 4

Caret Breakdown Details 5

Carat Breakdown...

Details on the basis of why, the "ET" language is setup the way it is.

 

A friend of mine helped me to define the 'key' more clearly as simply based on Half Cycloid geometry.  (google cycloid)

     I will add my understanding (based on what I was told) that helped me see this for what it is.

The information was given to me many years ago (very clearly I might add) but interpretation into actual words is my job.. and it took me about 20 years to get to this point where I can lay it out in detail.

It's like fishing.. you have a clear picture but need the right words to place it in the scope of what is known and established.  While many people 'channel' I believe they typical format is not what I myself engage in.  It is more direct and relative to how something works, how to make it go.

That "ET" technology... (if it is extra terrestrial) appears based on something I have long known about and been trying to find the opportunity to write about it.

The task is to figure out a technical instruction set that defines it for other people so they can make use of these tools.  The ability to see this information (in vivid, hyperspace geometry) tends to conflict with the ability to recall specific names of things and that is always a challenge when trying to translate what is otherwise clear to me into conventional words that express clearly what I am seeing.

It can take years to understand what one simple looking geometric relationship actually represents from our perspective.  In many ways this is where I do the work, even though the information was provided to me as clearly as it could be presented.



1. Frequency can best be described by Geometry.

 (The vibratory rate is a function of it's given travel, not time and this can be expressed as a quantity best geometrically.)

The following addresses why:

There is no greater, no lesser. We gage cycles in how many we can count for a given time but in open hyperspace sequential, time based counting systems are completely non-relevant.

So rather than key on x cycles per second the only solution is to key on the mode of a frequency.
(The actual name I was given is Modulus of Frequency) which is a geometry that defines the cycle rate.


2. Modulus is, a cycle for a given function. Each function is a geometric relationship. (think about this, you have a string plucked, it will resonate for a duration between physical points and we define the physical frame that it resonates in, rather than how many times it resonates over time.

So, the geometry is the frame of resonance, or the Modulus.



In the Caret thing.. it's a half Cycloid.

In our world of nuclear physics we try to count the beats and since the beats are non-linear it's not a real reference point. (which is why we keep going smaller, quarks, leptons still trying to grasp what they are)

Each one is already it's own resonant signature (modulous) defined by it's travel.

* The vibratory rate is a function of it's given travel, not time.

3. Proximation (or proximity) - Proximation is not an official word in the English language but it describes clearly a function of Proximity between two nodal functions.  You are required to use a proxima for your relationships in this type of geometric script.  often but not always the distance may be required but not in the typical incremental systems we like to use in linear 3d world but something more constant.  So, proximation is often similar to Modulus in form but is subtly different in that it is required for metering where metrics based on a liner convention do not apply. (they do not remain constant)

I borrowed the word (Proxima) from it's use in cosmology where it was used to avoid long names for star systems in favor of simply saying (Century Proxima) rather than the name of the star system itself.  It is applied much the same way in these geometric expressions, literally in a sequence of symbols to express the entire function of a statement.

I will detail this further and see if we can crack the basis for what is being written on the 'device'.

Don't freak out, I will explain this chart and by the time I am done it will seem simple.

The first thing you have to do is start understanding that we are trying to define the un-definable as it is beyond the scope of our known languages for describing things so we need to make a few adjustments and this is where we begin.

 

 

Wait, it gets better!

Caret Breakdown Details 5

 

 

 

 

Return to main Research page

 

 
     
 

All content and photos copyright (c) 2005,2006,2007 Karl Reinhart of The Shekinahguild.